A Comparative Analysis: Which Language Has Been More Strongly Conserved - Hebrew or Arabic

In the realm of Semitic languages, Arabic stands out as the most well-preserved, according to reliable sources such as Encyclopaedia Britannica and numerous linguistic analyses. This preservation is evident across the range of Semitic languages, from those that are actively used today to those that have long since passed into history, such as Akkadian and Eblaite.

The Preservation of Arabic

According to Reuben Hayat and other linguistic scholars, Hebrew has not been nearly as well-preserved. The key factor in the preservation of Arabic lies in the historical context of the Semitic language family. Arabic's preservation can be attributed to the fact that Arab civilization has traditionally been characterized by a history of conquest and cultural dominance. This historical backdrop allows us to understand why Arabic has remained more intact compared to Hebrew.

Comparing Classical Hebrew and Arabic

Let's delve deeper into the specifics of why Arabic can be considered more strongly conserved. One reason lies in the nature of the literature and texts in each language. Standard Arabic - the form of Arabic spoken and understood across North Africa, the Middle East, and the Arabian Peninsula - boasts a rich and ancient literary tradition. The earliest attestations of Standard Arabic’s written form date back to approximately 500 years before the rise of Islam, whereas Classical Hebrew was less well-preserved even during its heyday of popularity.

Modern Hebrew vs. Classical Hebrew

The modern revival of Hebrew is another point of comparison. Despite the efforts put into revitalizing the language, Modern Hebrew has undergone significant changes compared to its classical predecessor. Some Modern Hebrew speakers argue that the differences are minimal, but even if they are less pronounced, the overall picture still shows Arabic as more strongly conserved.

Phonetic Preservation

Phonetic preservation is a crucial factor in linguistic conservation. While Classical Hebrew did not maintain its phonetic features intact, Classical Arabic did. For instance, the phonetic features of Precise Semitic (PS) are retained more fully in Arabic than in any other Semitic language. Even in the presence of some changes, the overall phonetic structure of Arabic remains closer to its classical form.

The Dual Form

The retention of the dual form is another significant aspect. In Standard Arabic, the dual form is used for both nouns and verbs, and it is mandatory in the language. In contrast, Modern Hebrew lost the dual form entirely. While Arabic dialects have made some phonetic changes, they have largely preserved the dual form, indicating a stronger overall conservatism in the language.

Conclusion

In summary, the preservation of Arabic is a testament to its rich history of conquest and cultural dominance. While Hebrew has its own unique linguistic history and has been revitalized to modern times, it cannot compete in terms of long-term preservation with Arabic. This comparative analysis elucidates why Arabic stands out as the most strongly conserved Semitic language.

Keywords: Semitic languages, Arabic conservation, Hebrew conservation

Additional Resources: