Introduction to the CAT 2020 Examination Difficulty

CAT 2020 was a comprehensively designed examination aimed at assessing a candidate's aptitude and analytical skills. One of the prominent areas of discussion post the examination was the perceived difficulty level, with many candidates expressing their experiences and opinions about the toughness of different sections of the paper.

The Overall Perception of CAT 2020 Difficulty

While the exact difficulty level can be subjective and varies from candidate to candidate, it is notable that there were significant differences in opinions about the various sections. Some candidates opined that the overall difficulty was particularly challenging due to changes in the pattern, making it difficult to adapt. This article explores the various perspectives on the toughness level of the CAT 2020 examination, with a focus on the opinions of a particular candidate who took the exam in slot 3.

Analysing the CAT 2020 Pattern and Sections

According to the candidate, the main issues revolved around the pattern changes, which caused most people to find the examination tough to adjust with. Let us examine the performance and perceptions of the candidate who shared their experience:

Usage of H1 Tags for Main Sections

VARC (Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension) - Perceived as Very Tough

The candidate perceived the VARC section as very tough, stating, "All the best!!!" This indicates a high level of challenge that the candidate faced during this section, likely due to the complexity of the reading material and the variety of questions posed. The candidate managed to mark 12 questions, indicating their best effort, though the level of questions posed was high.

DILR (Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning) - Considered Very Tough

The opinion on the DILR section from this candidate was even more stringent. They described it as 'very tough,' with a critical observation that Data Interpretation (DI) was completely absent in their slot. The candidate managed to mark 5 questions, revealing that they faced significant challenges tackling the logical reasoning tasks and data interpretation problems that were present.

QA (Quantitative Ability) - Rated as Easy to Moderate

The QA section, delivered by this particular slot, was described by the candidate as 'easy to moderate.' This reflects the candidate's satisfaction with their performance in the numerical and arithmetic section, where questions were generally easier to handle despite the overall tough pattern. The candidate was able to mark 15 questions, indicating a performance that matched their expectations within the context of the given difficulty level.

Conclusion

The CAT 2020 examination, marked a significant shift in the examination pattern, which was noted by many candidates, including the one in this article. The candidate described the overall atmosphere as challenging but manageable for QA (easy to moderate), very tough for VARC (12 marked), and very tough for DILR (5 marked) especially without the presence of DI questions in their slot. This article concludes that the CAT 2020 toughness varied vastly between sections, highlighting the importance of preparation and adaptability to different patterns.

Key Takeaways

Toughness Level: The examination was generally perceived as tough, with the key points of variance in the VARC and DILR sections due to the absence of DI and challenging pattern changes, respectively. Regularity in Preparation: Despite the perceived difficulty, consistent preparation and adaptability to the new pattern were key win factors for candidates. Slot Variability: Each slot had its unique set of challenges, emphasizing the importance of familiarizing with different patterns to perform better.

In conclusion, the CAT 2020 was a complex examination where pattern changes significantly impacted the performance across different sections. Candidates' perspectives and experiences provide valuable insights into the toughness levels and paths for improvement for future aspirants.