Introduction
The recent wave of pro-Palestinian demonstrations at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) has brought to the forefront a critical question regarding the appropriate punishment for students involved. This range of potential punishments includes expulsion, degree withholding, referral to immigration authorities, and public shaming. The following explores each option and its implications.
Expulsion and Refusal to Confer Degrees
In the context of UCLA, one of the harshest proposed punishments is the outright expulsion of students involved in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. This would apply to both domestic and international students. Expulsion is a significant punishment as it not only affects the student's academic standing but also their future career prospects and personal life.
For students who are close to graduation, another layer of punishment could be imposed by withholding their degree until proven fully compliant. This approach ensures that even if students have almost completed their studies, the university would maintain control over their academic progress. This could be seen as a non-expulsive form of punishment that still leaves a mark on their academic record.
Referral to ICE and DOJ for Removal
For foreign national students on a study visa, the repercussions could be even more severe. Referring them to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) for removal from the USA is an extreme measure. This option could lead to a forced exit for students who were previously contributing positively to the academic community. It is important to consider the impact this could have on international students who see America as their academic and sometimes personal refuge.
Public Shaming
In addition to the formal punishments like expulsion and legal actions, public shaming can also be used as a punishment. This involves publicly naming the students involved in these demonstrations. Such actions can have long-lasting effects on the students' reputations and personal lives. Public shaming might serve as a deterrent for others in the university to engage in similar behavior.
Alternative Approaches
While these punishments are in the realm of possibilities, they also invite scrutiny from legal, ethical, and social perspectives. Universities like UCLA often strive to balance academic freedom with maintaining a respectful and inclusive environment. Alternative approaches such as comprehensive counseling sessions, community service, or mandatory educational programs on global perspectives may be more appropriate and effective.
Conclusion
The appropriate punishment for students at UCLA involved in pro-Palestinian demonstrations is a complex issue. While harsh measures like expulsion, referral to immigration, and public shaming have been proposed, they each come with significant drawbacks. Universities need to consider the long-term impacts on students' livelihoods and personal development. Developing a more balanced and comprehensive approach that includes counseling, education, and community service may provide a more constructive response to such incidents.