Choosing the Best Master’s Program for Interaction Design: CIID, Domus, or LCC?

For those embarking on their journey to master interaction design, the choice of where to obtain this vital skill can be daunting. Universities like CIID, Domus, and LCC (University of the Arts London) each bring unique advantages and challenges to the table. In this article, we will dive into a comparative analysis of these schools, focusing on interaction design, with special attention to the feedback from former students and the benefits of the respective ecosystems.

Comparison of CIID vs. Domus

Two prominent names in the field of interaction design educational programs are the Copenhagen Institute of Interaction Design (CIID) and Domus Academy. While Domus Academy has a strong reputation in the field of architecture, there is some skepticism regarding its proficiency in interaction design. Here is a comparison of the two:

Domus Academy

Domus Academy has a solid name in the architecture world but, when it comes to interaction design, the track record is less clear. While some students with a background in architecture find it relevant and beneficial, there are no specific mentions of seniors who achieved success in interaction design with this program. The expertise and focus at Domus seem more geared towards architectural design and related fields, making it less of a top pick for those aiming to specialize in interaction design.

Copenhagen Institute of Interaction Design (CIID)

On the other hand, the Copenhagen Institute of Interaction Design (CIID) is well-regarded for its specialized interaction design programs. Several former students have reported positive outcomes and success as a result of their time at CIID. These reports suggest a strong emphasis on practical skills and real-world application, likely due to the institute’s focus on user-centered design and user experience (UX) principles.

**Pros of CIID:** Specialized curriculum: CIID offers a curriculum that is heavily weighted towards interaction design. Years of experience: With a track record of well-placed alumni, CIID provides a clear pathway to success. Networking opportunities: Lessons from former students suggest a supportive and collaborative culture.

Adding LCC to the Mix

When the University of the Arts London (UAL) enters the scene, the decision-making process gets even more complicated. LCC, or London College of Communication, is less known for dedicated interaction design programs but is part of a larger institution that offers a broad range of design and creative disciplines. For those who are interested in exploring a wider range of creative opportunities in a city as culturally rich as London, LCC might be the perfect fit.

University of the Arts London (UAL)

UAL encompasses several colleges, including London College of Communication (LCC), Central Saint Martins, the Chelsea College of Art and Design, the London Collage of Fashion, the University of Arts, London, and the Wimbledon College of Art. This diversity can be advantageous for aspiring interaction designers who are also interested in additional creative disciplines.

**Pros of UAL’s LCC:**Broader skillset: Students can explore a wider range of design and creative subjects beyond interaction design.London’s ecosystem: Being in London, students have access to a thriving ecosystem of startups, tech companies, and major design firms, offering numerous networking and employment opportunities.Dynamic environment: The city environment and the various institutions within UAL contribute to a dynamic and supportive atmosphere for creative learning and growth.

**Cons of UAL’s LCC:**Limited interaction design focus: While LCC does offer some interaction design coursework, it may not have the same level of specialization or depth as a dedicated program like CIID.

Conclusion and Recommendation

In conclusion, the decision of whether to choose CIID, Domus, or LCC will greatly depend on your specific goals and preferences. If you are purely focused on interaction design and seek a specialized, well-regarded program, CIID is likely the best option. For those who are open to a broader range of creative disciplines and value the diverse and supportive ecosystem that London offers, LCC at UAL could be a compelling choice. Domus, while potentially valuable in architecture, does not have the same track record for interaction design, making it a less favorable option for this specific field.

Ultimately, the best choice is the one that aligns with your personal career goals, interests, and the opportunities you are looking for in your education and future career. Don’t shy away from visiting the campuses, meeting the staff, and speaking with current or former students to truly gauge which program feels like the best fit for you.