Comparing the Army Military Police and Air Force Security Forces
When it comes to serving in the military, understanding the missions and duties of different branches is crucial. This article explores the unique roles and responsibilities of the Army Military Police (MP) and the Air Force Security Forces (AFSF), helping those interested in a career in law enforcement within the military to make informed decisions.
Army Military Police (MP)
The Army Military Police is known for its diverse range of missions, extending beyond the typical law enforcement duties. These missions include convoy security, route reconnaissance, fixed-site security, and internee/prisoner operations. MP units often engage in route reconnaissance, evaluating roads and bridges for various factors such as weight limits, low overhangs, and narrow defiles. They also test communications to identify dead zones for tactical radios and compile all the necessary data for further use.
In addition to these detailed missions, Army MPs are also noted for their versatility. They can act as light infantry to secure points of interest, such as the Panamanian police dog kennel during Operation Just Cause. In this operation, an MP captain became the first female officer to lead U.S. troops into direct combat. This versatility stems from their greater access to vehicles, radios, and small arms weapons compared to infantry squads.
During basic training, Army MPs often receive more comprehensive training due to the larger size and variety of the Army. This extensive training can provide more varied experiences and prepare individuals better for the challenges ahead.
Air Force Security Forces (AFSF)
The Air Force Security Forces focus on a more specific set of missions: law enforcement, physical security, and air base ground defense. Unlike the Army, the Air Force still maintains fixed-site security as a significant mission. Although the Air Force no longer has nuclear or chemical weapons to secure, they still play a crucial role in protecting critical infrastructure and military installations.
While the missions of AFSF are more focused, some individuals may prefer the thrill of being on jump status, as this can offer a more exciting and dynamic experience.
Personal Insights
From the perspective of a retired AFSF member, the Army Military Police is often considered a better option. Not only do they tend to have better basic training, but the Army's larger size and more varied experience can be advantageous for those looking to build a robust career in military law enforcement.
On the other hand, some individuals, especially those who did not enjoy K9 duties, may find the Air Force Security Forces more appealing. Fixed-site security can sometimes be monotonous, akin to watching grass grow. However, AFSF also offers the excitement of being on jump status, which can add a different level of adventure to the role.
Conclusion
Choosing between the Army Military Police and Air Force Security Forces depends on personal preferences and career goals. For those seeking a diverse set of missions and more varied experiences, the Army Military Police may be the better choice. Meanwhile, those who prefer a more focused set of duties and enjoy the thrill of jump status may find the Air Force Security Forces more suitable.
Ultimately, the decision should align with individual career aspirations and entertainment needs.