Critical Analysis of SRM Rammurti Smarak College of Engineering and Technology (SRMS Bareilly)

SRM Rammurti Smarak College of Engineering and Technology (SRMS) in Bareilly, India, has gained significant attention due to its questionable practices and the recent series of student deaths, often reported as suicides but with many questions left unanswered. In this article, we will critically assess the college's environment, academic practices, and the overall student experience.

Placement and Campus Environment

According to personal experiences, upon graduating from SRMS, students often participate in campus placements where a handful of larger companies, such as TCS, are the main recruiters, while other small companies may hire 20 to 30 students. The strict regulatory environment is noteworthy, with students being prohibited from carrying their own mobile phones inside the campus. Day scholars are provided with transportation services, a necessity for daily travel to and from the college.

Student Safety Concerns

Each year, reports of student deaths have emerged, often sparking debates about the true cause. Notably, all such cases have been reported as suicide, with the college authorities entering the student rooms before the police and without any suicide notes being found. This raises serious concerns about the authenticity of these reports. The lack of strong action against such incidents is a cause for alarm. It is imperative for both parents and students to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity.

Academic Quality and Infrastructure

SRMS is often criticized for its poor academic standards. The institution provides an academic building where attendance is a primary focus rather than imparting knowledge. Faculty members, despite their high qualification, are often dependent on textbooks to deliver lectures, highlighting a lack of critical thinking and problem-solving skills among the teaching staff. Laboratories are utilized inefficiently, with lab assistants conducting the experiments and students merely observing. This not only fails to provide hands-on experience but also discourages curiosity and innovation. The college also offers a canteen that serves as a weight-loss regimen, emphasizing the health consciousness.

Placement and Job Opportunities

The placement cell at SRMS guarantees a low success rate, particularly in the fields of Mechatronics Engineering (ME) and Electrical Engineering (EEE), rather than ensuring successful placements. This creates a significant concern for students who need to secure jobs post-graduation. Despite having excellent bus services and regular hosteling facilities, students are restricted to limited outings and outings are gender-segregated, leading to a restrictive social environment. Additionally, the internet usage is heavily monitored, limiting students' access to information and leading to potential fines or bribes if students use mobile phones.

Other Infrastructure Issues

While SRMS boasts of uninterrupted power supply, this luxury is often negated during college hours when hostels experience frequent power outages. This can be particularly distressing for sick or hospitalized students who need consistent access to electricity. The sporting infrastructure is impressive, yet physical activities are strictly regulated, making it difficult for students to engage in extracurricular activities or sports beyond academic hours.

Conclusion

SRM Rammurti Smarak College of Engineering and Technology (SRMS) presents a complex landscape, with issues ranging from academic quality to student safety. The reported incidents of student deaths, often cloaked in the guise of suicides, warrant careful scrutiny. The poor academic practices, coupled with questionable support for students' overall development, make SRMS a cause for concern. Prospective students, parents, and educators should carefully consider the potential risks and seek alternative educational institutions. If you are already enrolled, finding support and making meaningful friendships can mitigate some of the negative experiences. In an effort to promote dialogue and improvement, it is essential to continue raising these critical issues.