Understanding the Irritation of Conspiracy Theorists

When dealing with conspiracy theorists, many find themselves in an exercise of frustration. The sheer stupidity and often cruel nature of their beliefs can be overwhelming. However, it's important to recognize that engaging with them can be counterproductive. This article aims to provide insight into why these discussions are so frustrating and when the line between skepticism and delusion is crossed.

The Core Issues with Conspiracy Theorists

Conspiracy theorists are often characterized by their choice of topics. They focus on 'super secret' conspiracies that lack any credible evidence, rather than actual conspiracies that are well-documented and openly known. A prime example is the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which was well-documented and supported by a vast array of evidence. Yet, conspiracy theorists generally turn a blind eye to these events, as they do not align with their preferred narratives.

Their fixation on unproven theories stems from a deep-seated belief in their specialized knowledge. This belief that they hold information others lack can be harmful, leading to baseless and often dangerous theories.

The Frustration of Reason in Unreason

Reason and evidence are the cornerstones of rational thinking. A reasonable skeptic would specify the evidence they require to accept an alternative narrative. For instance, they might say, 'If we had a legitimate video of what happened, we would be convinced. Until then, I am skeptical because of the lack of concrete evidence.' This attitude is open to change with credible information.

However, conspiracy theorists often dig their heels in when presented with evidence. This behavior is not driven by a lack of evidence but a refusal to accept any evidence that contradicts their beliefs. For them, even when faced with fake evidence, DNA planted by others, or misleading eyewitness accounts, they continue to solidify their conspiracy theories. This resistance to evidence showcases a critical lack of critical thinking and open-mindedness.

The Line Between Skepticism and Delusion

Skepticism and suspicion can be healthy, driving one to seek out the truth. However, when this skepticism crosses into delusion, it becomes irrational and harmful. Suspicion based on credible evidence can be addressed and resolved with more evidence. In contrast, conspiracy thinking thrives on an absence of evidence and a reliance on vague or fabricated theories.

Conspiracy theorists often find logical explanations for their theories and twist the evidence to fit their narrative. They may claim that fake evidence was planted by someone else, DNA was planted to confuse the public, and witness testimonies are fabricated. Their stubbornness in holding onto these beliefs showcases a deep distrust in the ability of evidence and logic to resolve issues.

Their unwillingness to accept scientific and factual evidence is a clear sign of their irrational beliefs. This disregard for established knowledge and evidence can lead to dangerous behaviors and outcomes.

Conclusion

Dealing with conspiracy theorists can be frustrating, as their lack of evidence-based reasoning and their refusal to admit the presence of evidence often lead to an impasse. Recognizing the line between healthy skepticism and irrational thinking is crucial. It's important to engage with evidence and logical arguments rather than baseless theories.