Discipline in Modern Education vs Historical Practices: Insights from a Former Head Teacher

Discipline in Modern Education vs Historical Practices: Insights from a Former Head Teacher

Education has continuously evolved, with disciplinary practices being one of the most discussed areas of change. Back in the late 1950s, when I was a student, corporal punishment was a common method used to enforce discipline. As a teacher, I sought alternative approaches, and over three decades, I only had to write three white cards and send students to the office three times. My focus on positive reinforcement and addressing the root causes of misbehavior helped me handle issues effectively, often through reflective one-on-one conversations and by withholding free time, which students valued most.

Historical Practices of Discipline in Schools

When I attended an all-boys private prep school in the late 1950s, corporal punishment was the primary method of enforcing discipline. Teachers would administer up to three strokes of a cane in front of the class to a student who was almost always bare-bottomed. In Physical Education (PE), staff and a few teachers used a leather slipper to administer the same treatment in public view. Serious offenses were handled by the headmaster in his study using a thicker cane, often delivering six strokes.

Modern Approaches to Discipline in Education: Insights from the Head Teacher

As a former head teacher, I have seen the shift in disciplinary practices, which have evolved to prioritize positive reinforcement and understanding the underlying reasons for students' behavior. Our approach at the school I was in charge of entailed several strategies aimed at fostering positive behavior.

Positive Reinforcement and Identification of Roots

Our first approach was to praise and recognize appropriate behavior, and we provided rewards for excellent performance. When dealing with poor behavior, we sought to identify the reasons behind it—whether it was home issues, difficulties with learning, or other personal challenges. Addressing these issues directly often led to a reduction in misbehavior.

Using Punishments for Deliberate Misbehavior

For deliberate misbehavior where there was no reasonable explanation, we employed various forms of punishment, starting with reprimands and verbal warnings. We also implemented extracurricular duties like litter picking or detention. In some rare cases, we resorted to corporal punishment, such as using the slipper or cane. However, as that option became more controversial and culturally inappropriate, its use became increasingly limited.

Exclusion as a Last Resort

While severe misbehavior was a critical concern, we were also mindful of the educational needs of the student. Therefore, our exclusionary measures were more of a temporary circuit breaker rather than a formal punishment. Most often, they served as a deterrent for future misbehavior and a chance for the student to reflect on their actions.

Conclusion: A Balanced Approach to Discipline

Disciplinary methods must evolve to meet the changing needs of our society and students. While corporal punishment was once common, it is now widely viewed as an inappropriate and harmful practice. Positive reinforcement, understanding the underlying causes, and addressing problems constructively are more effective methods for maintaining order and promoting positive behavior in schools.

As a former head teacher, I have seen the effectiveness of these strategies firsthand. By fostering an environment where students feel understood and supported, we can help them grow into responsible and respectful individuals.