Introduction
The confrontation between the Students Federation of India (SFI) and the Sangh Parivar affiliates in Calicut University is not only about education but also about power dynamics and political commitment. This article discusses the underlying reasons behind this conflict, focusing on the involvement of RSS and the Kerala government's response.
The Role of RSS in Kerala
The hotheads from the Sangh Parivar, particularly the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), have long sought to establish a presence in Kerala. However, Kerala has historically maintained a distinct and strongly rooted awareness against extremism. The size and influence of the RSS in Kerala are smaller compared to other states in India, yet the organization is determined to gain a foothold in the state's educational institutions and other political sectors.
The Confrontation and Its Immediate Causes
Recently, the Indian government imposed direct pressure on the Kerala election victory of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The state's elected government is being faced with a series of challenges, including the reopening of bills by the Governor and the intervention of the ED (Enforcement Directorate), including the National Investigation Agencies and CBI. These actions are part of a broader strategy by the RSS to challenge the political and social order in Kerala.
The SFI's Resistance and Stance
The Students Federation of India (SFI) has spearheaded a campaign against the RSS's attempt to influence institution management and cultural heritage. The SFI argues that the RSS-style education prioritizes political ideology over educational values, specifically in the realms of art, literature, and philosophy. They believe that this approach is unduly restrictive and detrimental to the rich cultural heritage of Kerala.
The Impact on University Culture
In their opposition, the SFI points to the unique cultural and intellectual landscape of Calicut University. Unlike other states in India, Kerala places a high value on the scholarly pursuit, artistic expression, and philosophical inquiry. The SFI contends that the RSS's policies would stifle this ethos, attempting to eliminate vibrant art forms, literature, and cultural practices that have been essential to Kerala's identity. They argue that the RSS's cultural endeavors are not just indifferent but actively seek to dismantle and replace these elements with a more controlled, ideologically aligned curriculum.
The Governor's Role
The Governor, acting under the pressure from the central government, has sought to implement changes that could potentially favor the RSS. This has led to heightened tensions, as seen in the SFI's protests and the resistance displayed by the Kerala government and its officials. The current Chief Minister is standing firm against these changes, emphasizing the state's commitment to resisting political encroachment that undermines the autonomy and integrity of its educational and cultural institutions.
Legal and Political Considerations
The situation in Kerala is complex, with legal and constitutional debates surrounding the Governor's actions and the central government's oversight. The Indian laws and constitution allow for varied interpretations, creating a malleable framework for handling such conflicts. Despite this, the Chief Minister and his team are facing significant challenges, including political pressure and questionable legal justifications for the Governor's maneuvers.
Conclusion
The confrontation between the SFI and RSS affiliates in Calicut University reflects a broader struggle for cultural and educational autonomy in Kerala. While the RSS aims to assert control over educational institutions and cultural norms, the opposition from the SFI and the Kerala government highlights the state's resolve to protect its unique heritage and values.