Evaluating Journalism Excellence: Can We Afford an 8.5 Rating?
When it comes to evaluating journalism, the task is not as simple as it might seem. If we award a high rating based on great journalism, who will be the best journalist in the field? This article delves into the complexities of assessing journalistic excellence and examines the criteria used to rate journalists.
The Case of Palki Sharma
As an example, we recently encountered Palki Sharma, an anchor for W.I.O.N. She holds a strong position among international news anchors from channels such as BBC, Al Jazeera, and The New York Times. According to Palki Sharma, her rating on the scale of great journalism would be 8.5 out of 10. However, is this rating truly reflective of her abilities, or is it merely a compromise given the constraints of her role?
The Evolution of Journalism
The nature of journalism has undergone significant changes over the years. Today, we see a diverse range of journalists specializing in various fields, from broadcast journalism to sports journalism, and from foreign affairs to economic matters. However, the question remains: Can we afford to give an 8.5 rating based on great journalism?
Challenges in Assessing Great Journalism
One of the primary challenges in assessing great journalism lies in the subjective nature of the criteria. What defines great journalism? While some may argue that it is the ability to provide accurate and unbiased information, others might emphasize the importance of engaging storytelling and delivering valuable insights.
Furthermore, the field of journalism is constantly evolving with the advent of new technologies and changing consumer preferences. With the rise of digital media, the traditional benchmarks of journalism may no longer apply in their entirety. This raises questions about how we should redefine and measure journalistic excellence in the modern context.
Historical Figures in Journalism
Reflecting on the past, we can identify several historical figures who were regarded as flagbearers of true journalism. These include Kuldip Nayyar, Ramnath Goenka, Chalapathi Rao, and B.G. Verghese. These journalists were known for their dedication to accurate reporting, integrity, and commitment to holding power accountable.
However, even these figures faced criticism and challenges. They were often subjected to pressure and even legal actions for their investigative reporting. This highlights the importance of not just the quality of journalism, but also the courage and perseverance required to maintain journalistic integrity.
The Future of Journalism
As we move forward, the role of journalists becomes even more crucial in a rapidly changing world. With the increasing prominence of fake news and misinformation, the need for accurate and reliable journalism has never been more critical.
Given the complexity of evaluating great journalism and the ongoing evolution of the field, it is essential to adopt a holistic approach. This involves not only assessing the output of journalists but also considering their integrity, ethics, and commitment to providing accurate information.
Conclusion
Evaluating journalists based on great journalism is a multifaceted challenge. While Palki Sharma's rating of 8.5 out of 10 may be justified based on her performance, it is crucial to recognize the broader context and the evolving nature of journalism. The quest for true journalistic excellence requires a continual assessment of both the quality of output and the integrity of the practitioners themselves. By maintaining a rigorous and inclusive approach to evaluation, we can ensure the continued relevance and reliability of journalism in the modern era.