Introduction to Ph.D. Research
Ph.D. research is a complex and multifaceted endeavor that can vary significantly depending on the audience to which it is presented. This article discusses strategies for presenting your Ph.D. research in a manner that is engaging and understandable for both academic and non-academic audiences. Whether you are discussing your research with faculty, peers, or the general public, the approach should be tailored to the audience's level of familiarity with the topic.
Academic vs. Non-Academic Audiences
When presenting your Ph.D. research to an academic audience, you can delve into the specialized terminology of your field. This can include discussing specific methodologies, theoretical frameworks, and empirical findings. However, for a non-academic audience, it is essential to present the same information in a more accessible language, avoiding jargon and focusing on the broader implications of your research.
Value of Your Research
It is often beneficial to highlight the potential impact of your research. For example, you might share how your Ph.D. project can open up new lines of inquiry in your field and serve as a cornerstone for a successful research career. Additionally, emphasize any wider development opportunities included in the doctoral program. These may include advanced research skills, interdisciplinary knowledge, or even practical skills that can be applied in various career paths.
Case Study: Ph.D. Research in Social Science and Natural Science
A detailed examination of Ph.D. research comparing macroeconomics and social science with Drosophila genetics and natural science provides insight into how structured citation networks and mental models of fields can be similar yet distinct. This is illustrated through longitudinal co-cited author mapping in two scientific literatures, which helps identify congruence, or the shared structures, in the way these fields evolve and interact.
Key Findings
The research, titled 'Longitudinal Cocited Author Mapping and Intellectual Structure: A Test of Congruence in Two Scientific Literatures,' reveals that the citation patterns created by authors and their mental models produce significant structural similarities and interesting differences. This study spans approximately 35 years of research and publication, offering a rich vein of data to explore the evolution and divergence of fields.
Practical Application: An Investigative Dissertation on Self-Control
To further illustrate the practical application of Ph.D. research, consider the dissertation by Robb D. L. (2002), titled 'An Investigation of Self-Control and Its Relationship to Ethical Attitudes in Criminal Justice Personnel.' This work applied Gottfredson and Hirschi's theory, which posits self-control and opportunity as key factors in crime causation, to a specific demographic—criminal justice personnel.
Research Objectives and Methodology
The dissertation aimed to compare self-control and ethical attitudes among three distinct groups: current criminal justice personnel, criminal justice students, and former criminal justice personnel who had been convicted of a crime. Empirical evidence supports the notion that higher levels of self-control are associated with adherence to ethical standards in criminal justice settings. Importantly, the research also identified significant correlations between self-control and ethical attitudes, underscoring the importance of self-control in preventing criminal behavior.
Implications for Practice and Future Research
The findings of this study have implications for organizational behavior in criminal justice settings. By understanding the role of self-control in ethical decision-making, practitioners and policymakers can develop training programs and interventions aimed at enhancing self-control among criminal justice personnel. Moreover, this research could inform future studies on the development of self-control interventions in various fields, including education, healthcare, and business management.
Conclusion
Communicating your Ph.D. research effectively is crucial for engaging diverse audiences and advancing your career. By understanding the differences between academic and non-academic presentations and focusing on the value and impact of your research, you can enhance your credibility and broaden your influence. Whether you aim to pursue an academic career, apply your research practically, or simply share your findings with the public, the approach should be adaptable and informative.