Exploring the Concept of the Cosmos and Universes: A Philosophical and Scientific Perspective
Wouldn't the idea of there being multiple universes imply the existence of something greater, a 'meta-universe' that holds all these universes together? Can we still call the combined multiverses 'the universe'?
From a philosophical standpoint, the simple answer is yes. The notion of a 'meta-universe' is a conceptual construct, but one that is fascinating and intellectually stimulating. However, in the realm of empirical science, we can only refer to this 'meta-universe' as Cosmos- the entirety of existence.
The Term 'Meta' has become so popular that it has lost its meaning in some contexts. A more appropriate term to use here is Cosmos, which refers to the entirety of existence, as opposed to a universe, a finite portion of this larger entity.
Defining Cosmos and Universe
Cosmos represents the summation of all universes /- Binary Universes, the Nothingness that created them. Nothingness, here, implies no matter, no energy, and is therefore infinite in time and space, existing eternally. This distinction is crucial when understanding the difference between a finite universe and an infinite Cosmos. Essentially, a universe is a part of the Cosmos, but the Cosmos is all-encompassing.
Universe, in contrast, comprises all the universes that follow a /- Binary Universe System, meaning for every universe that exists, there must be an equivalent, yet opposite universe (anti-universe). This equilibrium is maintained by Dark Matter and Energy, which ensures that the Zero Net Energy theory of the Cosmos holds true. This balance sets a potential difference/voltage, which can explain the energy and power in the universe.
Understanding the Cosmos and Multiverses
The distinction between Cosmos and universe allows us to answer several pressing questions. For instance, what lies beyond the boundaries of our universe? Simply, it is Nothingness- the absence of matter, energy, and the Higgs field. This empty space signifies the end of the observable universe.
Furthermore, as the Cosmos is infinite in space and time, it suggests that many /- Binary Universes can be created, as proposed by M Theory. This distinction clarifies that our universe is not infinite and must have a beginning and an end, whereas the Cosmos, being infinite, can accommodate countless other /- Binary Universe Systems.
Implications of Defining Universe and Cosmos
Defining universe and Cosmos separately allows us to understand the laws of physics in a more coherent manner. For example, the /- Binary Universe System operates on principles similar to a /-battery, where energy depletion leads to the Heat Death of the universe. This concept aligns with the Law of Entropy and Decay, marking the end of our universe and the beginning of a new one.
By using 0000 in the Space/Time Continuum as a common origin, we avoid conflicting stories and tales involving gods and pre-existing entities. Unless these entities can be logically explained, they are merely considered as tautologies with circular logic. Therefore, no need for concepts like branes, quantum foam, vacuum, quantum energy collisions, hyper-universes, or singularities.
These concepts must be accompanied by valid origins, much like the Law of Thermodynamics, which did not exist before the Big Bang. All laws of physics must ultimately succumb to the Law of Entropy and Decay, the greatest law of all, signaling the end of our universe and the beginning of a new one, starting from point 0000 in the Cosmos of Nothingness.
Thus, the idea of a 'meta-universe' or 'meta-Cosmos' is best described as the Cosmos. While multiple universes together can be called 'the universes', they must fall into this category because a universe must have a beginning and therefore an end, whereas the Cosmos is infinite in time and space.