Is Boycotting Commencement Speeches an Acceptable Form of Protest?
The recent trend of students boycotting commencement speeches has sparked debate about the appropriateness and effectiveness of such actions. In this article, we explore the arguments on both sides and provide a balanced perspective on whether boycotting commencement speeches should be considered a legitimate form of protest.
The Disapprovals and Boycotts
The text under discussion underscores a strong viewpoint against student boycotts of commencement speeches. The author argues that such actions disrupt a moment marking both solemnity and joy, impacting the experience of multiple graduates and their families. According to the author, the majority of protesters could not even locate Gaza on a map, suggesting that their upset lacks genuine understanding or reason.
Right to Protest in America
In the United States, the right to non-violent protest is enshrined in the Constitution, providing students the freedom to express their disapproval of various issues. However, the article also advocates for alternative forms of protest that could be more impactful. For example, the author suggests a walkout as a more dramatic form of protest, which can be a powerful form of demonstration that also allows participants to attend and advocate their views.
Historical Context of Student Protests
The text draws a parallel to the Vietnam War era, where stunned graduates witnessed the destruction their peers would face. This historical context highlights the emotional and ethical implications of such protests, suggesting that refusing to attend a commencement ceremony is not just a forfeited political statement but a moral one. However, the author maintains that disruptions at such important events are misplaced and unproductive.
Protests and Their Impact
The author questions the efficacy of boycotts in achieving their intended goals. In the case of Israel, the argument suggests that protests have failed to influence Israeli policies against terrorist attacks. Furthermore, they argue that such protests are often driven by external funding and may lack genuine moral or ethical backing. For instance, the author mentions that some protesters receive financial support from individuals like George Soros, linked to foreign organizations that have a clear interest in destabilizing Israel.
Ethical Considerations and Consequences
The text raises ethical concerns about the values and morals of students who engage in such protests. The author views these behaviors as self-centered and destructive to the spirit of celebration and achievement that graduations represent. The conclusion is that students should be held accountable for their actions, and those who disrupt events should face consequences, such as expulsion if necessary.
Conclusion
The debate over whether student boycotts of commencement speeches are appropriate continues. While non-violent protest holds a place in societal dialogue, the questions of efficacy, morality, and ethical stance must be carefully considered. As these discussions unfold, it is crucial to balance the right to protest with the need to maintain the integrity and spirit of such important events.