Understanding the Controversy Surrounding Periyar and Lord Rama

While Periyar did not hit the portrait of Lord Rama with slippers, it is important to clarify the context and motivations behind such actions. The incident in question, often associated with an anti-Hindu stance or a significant act of rebellion, can be better understood by delving into the deeper beliefs and historical context surrounding both Periyar and his followers.

The Meaning Beyond the Portraits

Periyar, an influential social reformer and thinker in Tamil Nadu, India, was a vocal critic of Hindu orthodoxy and its social norms. He denounced the worship of idols, believing they detracted from the core spiritual practices of Hinduism. Considering this, the notion that Periyar hit a portrait of Lord Rama is not taken lightly. Even if one could hit a portrait, it is insignificant in the broader philosophical and spiritual contexts of Hinduism, which are centered around the concepts of Atman (the individual soul) and Brahman (the universal soul).

Atman and Brahman transcend material objects and experiences. Hitting a portrait does not equate to insulting the essence of a deity, as it is the spiritual connotations that matter, not physical actions. Therefore, the act of hitting or desecrating a portrait is misplaced and misses the true essence of Hindu philosophy.

Context of the Incident

There are varied accounts of what transpired during the march related to the Ravana Leela. Some reports suggest that participants did throw or hang slippers on the portrait of Lord Rama. It is crucial to recognize the broader context of the movement led by Periyar and his followers. Their actions were rooted in a desire to challenge and critique certain aspects of Hindu culture and religious practices, particularly those that they saw as oppressive or discriminatory.

Periyar's philosophy and activism were never about reacting impulsively but about deliberate and informed actions aimed at social reform. The march and the ensuing actions were meant to highlight the importance of celebrating and validating the identity and values of Tamil people, which were often suppressed by dominant religious narratives.

Tamil Identity and Cultural Rejection

The celebration of the Ravana Leela by burning the image of Lord Rama can be seen as a form of cultural assertiveness. In certain parts of India, the destruction of the image of Lord Rama symbolizes a rejection of the oppressive ideologies propagated through stories like the Ramayana. For many Tamils, this narrative depicts Rama as a figure who imposed his will on others and denied their rights and identities.

Ravana, in various cultural interpretations, is often portrayed as the embodiment of intelligence, valor, and love. Periyar and his followers saw Ravana as a hero who stood up against injustice, which resonated strongly with their own struggles and aspirations for social and cultural liberation.

Reactions and Responses

The condemnation of the actions later by Periyar is a clear indication of his nuanced stance. While he rallied against the oppressive aspects of Hinduism, including its idol worship, he also emphasized the importance of not becoming reactive or taking violent measures against other cultural or religious practices. His non-reactive approach, as evidenced by his reaction, underscores the need for a balanced and thoughtful approach to social and cultural reform.

Periyar believed that true change comes from enlightenment and education, not through destruction or violence. Therefore, it is important to consider his broader philosophy and the intention behind his actions in the context of larger social and cultural dynamics.

Conclusion

The important takeaway from Periyar's actions, including those related to the Ravana Leela, is the need to move beyond superficial reactions and understand the deeper, philosophical significance of our actions. The essence of Periyar's teachings lies in promoting understanding, tolerance, and progress through constructive criticism and dialogue, rather than reactive and violent actions.

By honoring the principles of Atman and Brahman and respecting the diverse cultural and religious expressions, we can foster a more inclusive and harmonious society.