Personal Reflections on the TANCET MBA 2017 Exam: Assessing Difficulty Levels and Strategies for Success

Personal Reflections on the TANCET MBA 2017 Exam: Assessing Difficulty Levels and Strategies for Success

Yesterday was quite the day for the aspirants of the TANCET MBA 2017, witnessing a diverse mix of difficulties and ease in different sections. While some parts seemed to challenge the candidates, others were relatively straightforward. This article is a detailed report of the exam experience, along with an analysis of the difficulty levels faced by participants.

Overview of the TANCET MBA 2017 Exam

The TANCET MBA 2017, conducted by the Consortium of Management Institutes in Tamil Nadu, India, comprises various sections that test a candidate's aptitude, comprehension, and analytical skills. Here is a breakdown of each section and the feedback from participants:

Part 1: Quantitative Aptitude

Starting with the Quantitative Aptitude section, candidates have reported that it was rather straightforward, much as it usually is. This section included a mix of arithmetic, algebra, and geometry problems. The key to acing this part is to solve the questions with precision and speed. Candidates are advised to have a good grasp of basic mathematical concepts and to practice constructing quick and accurate solutions.

Part 2: Data Sufficiency

The Data Sufficiency section was also considered relatively easy. This part involves determining whether the given information is sufficient to answer a question, requiring both logical thinking and analytical skills. Candidates found this section to be well-formatted and straightforward. Developing a systematic approach to solve these problems can significantly ease the process for test takers.

Part 3: Comprehension

Comprehension proved to be the section that posed some challenges. Categorized into four parts, each section carried only 5 marks. However, this limited the time available to thoroughly read and analyze each passage. Candidates mentioned that part 2 took more time than expected, which is understandable given the complexity of the passages. It is crucial to manage time effectively by skimming through the passages quickly and highlighting key points before attempting to answer the questions.

Part 4: Business Analysis

With a total of 20 business analysis questions, this section was reported as moderate. The questions required a blend of logical reasoning and practical business acumen. Candidates need to be well-prepared with a strong foundation in business concepts and to sharpen their problem-solving techniques.

Part 5: Logical Reasoning

The final part of the exam, Logical Reasoning, was noted as the most difficult by many participants. It involved reasoning in verbal, logical, and numerical domains. This section required a deep understanding of logical structures and effective time management to tackle each question efficiently.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Reflecting on the day, the TANCET MBA 2017 exam tested the candidates in various dimensions. While some sections were easier, others presented a significant challenge. Below are some strategies and tips for MBA aspirants as they gear up for the next exam:

Prepare with a variety of resources: Make use of books, online courses, and practice tests to build a strong foundation in each section. Focus on speed and accuracy: Improve your problem-solving speed while ensuring accuracy in each section. Time management is key to success in the TANCET MBA exam. Simulate exam conditions: Regular practice under realistic exam settings can help reduce the anxiety and improve performance. Analyze past papers: Analyzing previous years' question papers can provide insights into the types of questions that may be asked and help refine your strategies.

The TANCET MBA 2017 exam is a critical component of securing a place in top management institutes. By understanding the patterns and difficulties of past exams, candidates can better prepare for the challenges ahead.

All the best: MBA PATHSHALA – Abhijeet Singh

Get the MBA CET 2016 analysis and tips to score 145.