Phenomenology: A Core or Irrelevant Part of Philosophy?
When contemplating questions like 'Is phenomenology really a part of philosophy or is it irrelevant to talk about what experience viscerally feels like for a human being,' it's important to consider the nuances and complexities that come with such inquiries. These questions often stem from misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the nature and intent of the topics they address.
The Nature of Phenomenology and Philosophy
Firstly, to address the question of whether phenomenology is a part of philosophy, it's crucial to establish some foundational points. Philosophically, a discipline or field is considered a part of philosophy if it engages with fundamental questions about reality, existence, values, and human knowledge and experience. This makes it clear that phenomenology, as the discipline focused on understanding the structures of experience from the first-person perspective, is indeed a part of philosophy. While there is no clear-cut, universally accepted criterion for determining what constitutes a part of philosophy, the presence of philosophers studying and contributing to the field of phenomenology alone qualifies it as a valid and integral part of philosophical inquiry.
The Relevance of Human Experience
Secondly, the question about the irrelevance of discussing what experience feels like for a human being touches on a more nuanced area. This part of the inquiry suggests a potential critique of phenomenology, positing that discussions about subjective experience are superfluous or irrelevant. However, this line of questioning itself risks oversimplification and misunderstanding.
Phenomenology is deeply concerned with understanding the subjective experiences of human beings. It argues that to truly grasp human existence and the essence of human consciousness, one must delve into the lived experiences of individuals. For phenomenologists, the first-person perspective is not only important but essential for comprehending the rich tapestry of human existence. This approach challenges traditional analytical philosophy, which often focuses on abstract reasoning and second or third-person perspectives.
Evaluating the Critique of Phenomenology
The critique presented in the form of an argument can be broken down into three premises:
If it is irrelevant to talk about phenomenology, then phenomenology can't be a part of philosophy. It is irrelevant to talk about phenomenology. Therefore, phenomenology can't be a part of philosophy.This argument, while structurally sound, is problematic on several levels:
Relevance and History
Regarding the first premise, even if it were conclusively determined that phenomenology was irrelevant, it would still be part of the historical and philosophical discourse. Important historical figures and movements within philosophy are often regarded not just for their contemporary relevance but also for their historical significance and influence on subsequent thought. Phenomenology, a movement that has significantly influenced many thinkers, would remain a pivotal aspect of the discipline regardless of its perceived contemporary utility.
Nature of Phenomenological Inquiry
The second premise, which suggests the irrelevance of all experiential study, is unsound. Phenomenology, being specifically the study of the inner life and experiential lived realities, is inherently centered around understanding human experience. This perspective is not just relevant but is essential for any comprehensive understanding of human existence. Beliefs about the relevancy of phenomenology should be grounded in a robust understanding of the subject matter rather than anecdotal or subjective assertions. It is crucial not to dismiss the value of studying human experience just because some philosophers might perceive it as less relevant.
Cross-Section of Philosophical Inquiry
Phenomenology intersects with other important subfields within philosophy, such as philosophy of mind, language, aesthetics, and existentialism. These intersections elevate the significance of phenomenology within the broader context of philosophical inquiry. Claims about the irrelevance of phenomenology must take into account its connections with other relevant fields. For example, the existentialist views of phenomenology, like that of Jean-Paul Sartre, highlight the importance of understanding the first-person perspective in crafting a comprehensive philosophy.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the value and relevance of phenomenology lie in its ability to provide a first-person, experiential lens through which to understand human existence. Although there might be valid critiques, such as the potential irrelevance of certain aspects of phenomenological study, these critiques need to be approached with a nuanced and critical eye. Phenomenology remains a valuable and integral part of philosophical inquiry, and dismissing it as irrelevant would be a mistake. The study of phenomenology not only enriches our understanding of human experience but also deepens our engagement with the fundamental questions of philosophy.