Introduction

Gone are the days when discussing gender identity was viewed as a taboo. The modern discourse emphasizes respect, inclusivity, and understanding. However, the assertion that trans-women are not women and should be referred to as something other than women can be both perplexing and harmful. This article aims to explore the complexity of these debates, respectful language, and the importance of inclusivity in our everyday conversations and societies.

Respectful Language and Gender Identity

The discourse around gender identity has become increasingly nuanced, and respectful language is a critical part of this journey. The term 'cis-gender' is used to describe individuals whose gender identity aligns with the gender they were assigned at birth. 'Trans-women' refers to individuals who were assigned male at birth but identify as women. The use of these terms is an acknowledgment of the diversity and complexity of gender identities and an effort to respect the self-identification of individuals.

The title “How come trans-women insist on being called just women but they call biological women cis or birthing persons?” raises several flawed assumptions. First, the term 'cis-gender' is used to highlight that such individuals have not had a gender identity that is different from their assigned gender. It is not an inferior category. Second, the term 'birthing person' is increasingly used to acknowledge the diversity of experience and identity among those who give birth, beyond the binary of female-male.

The Importance of Respect and Accurate Frameworks

It is wrong to dismiss trans-women and label them as 'retards' or 'degenerate men.' This not only perpetuates harmful stereotypes but also fails to recognize the complex journeys that many transgender individuals undertake. The assertion that these individuals are 'delusional' is a gross misrepresentation of their experiences and the social and psychological pressures they face.

Equating trans-women with eunuchs is also problematic. Eunuchs were male castrated individuals who could function in certain social roles, especially in regions with hierarchical political and social structures. However, this comparison is inaccurate, as it does not account for the genuine and authentic experience of identity and transition that many trans-women have.

Challenges in Communication and Understanding

The frustration expressed in the article concerning the need for labels like 'cis' and 'trans' stems from a misunderstanding of these terms. The classification of 'cis-gender' and 'trans-gender' is not meant to segregate or isolate groups but to acknowledge and respect the different ways people experience gender. It is important to recognize that many people's identities are multi-faceted and self-defined.

Some cis-women have expressed discomfort when called 'cis,' as it can sometimes be perceived as a slight, or even a denial of their identity. However, the label 'cis' is not intended to undermine the experiences of cis-women but rather to provide a context for understanding the experiences of trans-women.

Conclusion

The discourse on gender identity and the use of respectful language are crucial steps towards creating a more inclusive society. The label 'trans-woman' is a way to acknowledge and respect the journey of individuals who experience their gender differently. The use of these labels should not be seen as a segregation but as a recognition of the diversity and complexity of human experiences.

In conclusion, it is through dialogue, respect, and understanding that we can create a more equitable and inclusive world. The fight for respect is not about labeling but about recognizing the myriad ways in which people experience and interpret their gender.