Reporting Ethical Violations in the Military: When to Speak Up

The responsibility of reporting ethical violations is a delicate matter in any organization, but it is especially significant within the military. Understanding the proper course of action can be crucial in maintaining order and integrity. In this article, we will explore the nuances of reporting such violations, whether they should be reported to the chain of command, or if an alternative route might be necessary.

The Dilemma of Reporting

One of the central issues facing military service members is the cultural perception that reporting unethical behavior is akin to being a 'rat.' This attitude, influenced by a generation of people from various backgrounds, often leads to a cycle of silence rather than action. This can have severe consequences, especially when it comes to social welfare fraud and other abuses.

Case Study: A Common Scenario

Consider a scenario where a military serviceman is aware of another individual's failure to report Task Unfinished (UA) as per Naval regulations. In my first command, a sailor reported to me that a colleague was leaving for lunch and never returning. Initially, many of my peers viewed this behavior positively, even boasting that avoiding the 'powers that be' was their way of sticking it to the system. However, as I pointed out, the cafeteria was meant for refueling and not as a way to evade responsibilities, especially when others (trainees) were expected to do the same task.

The Validity of Taking Action

Not taking action can be seen as condoning the violation, which can make the non-action speaker vulnerable. After all, inaction can be interpreted as consent. I always took some sort of action in cases of minor ethical violations, such as inappropriate comments made by a senior NCO. In other cases, such as instances of drug and alcohol problems leading to absentia, I went to higher authorities, resulting in disciplinary actions.

Proactive Measures to Prevent Violations

Building a culture of integrity requires proactive steps. I often informed my unit to avoid situations where they might jeopardize my integrity and career. This includes being cautious about invitations that might subject me, or others, to questionable behaviors. For example, lower-ranking personnel might invite me to a party where underage drinking is likely. In such cases, I would either avoid the party or leave at an appropriate time. These actions not only protect mine and others' integrity but also help in upholding the standards required in a military setting.

The Role of the Inspector General (IG)

But what if you are afraid of retaliation for reporting the violation? In such cases, you have the option to report the matter directly to the Inspector General (IG). The IG is an independent source of investigation for internal complaints, ensuring that allegations are thoroughly examined without fear of retribution.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the decision to report a military serviceman's ethical violations should not be taken lightly. However, the potential consequences of inaction often far outweigh the risks. Always consider the broader impact of the violations and take appropriate action. Whether through your chain of command or to the IG, it is essential to uphold the standards of professional integrity and accountability in the military.