Should the US Army Drop Its High School Diploma Requirement for Enlistment?

The debate over whether the US Army should drop its high school diploma requirement for enlistment has been a contentious topic among both soldiers and civilians. This article delves into the pros and cons of such a change, examining the impact on military readiness, diversity, and the individual soldier's career prospects.

Introduction

The US Army has traditionally required applicants to have a high school diploma or GED to be eligible for enlistment. This requirement ensures a certain baseline of education and knowledge before soldiers can begin their military training. However, recent discussions have emerged questioning the necessity of this mandate, leading to a closer examination of its benefits and drawbacks.

Arguments in Favor

Some argue that dropping the high school diploma requirement opens the doors to a more diverse pool of recruits. This includes individuals from less privileged backgrounds or those who may have dropped out of high school due to circumstances beyond their control. Many believe that the military can serve as a transformative experience, granting these individuals the opportunity to improve their lives and education.

For example, during my service, I encountered many soldiers who received their high school diplomas or GEDs while in the military. These soldiers often utilized the educational programs and resources available to them, such as the GI Bill, to pursue further education or trade schools. They went on to build successful careers inside and outside the service, demonstrating the power of educational opportunities.

Arguments Against

Opponents of dropping the high school diploma requirement argue that it would lower the overall educational standards within the US Army. This could potentially result in a less trained and less capable force, which would be detrimental to military readiness and effectiveness. Additionally, some believe that educational backgrounds are closely tied to cognitive abilities and discipline, which are critical for military success.

I very much disapprove of this idea. The US military is known for its high standards of education and professionalism. You need to be a smart and disciplined person to succeed in this profession. Lowering these standards would undoubtedly lead to worse outcomes, both in the short and long term.

Real-World Examples and Anecdotes

During my own service, I met a soldier who was adamant that there were no airplanes in World War I, despite holding a high school diploma. This anecdote highlights the potential dangers of a less educated or less informed military. On the other hand, I have also seen highly educated soldiers falter in the face of combat, proving that education does not guarantee competence or intelligence.

A diploma or degree is valuable in that it signifies a certain level of potential. However, it does not cure stupidity or overly inflated egos. I have encountered soldiers with four-year degrees who were fresh in the military and deemed themselves above their peers, only to face consequences in combat due to their lack of proper discipline and listening skills.

Conclusion

The debate over whether the US Army should drop its high school diploma requirement for enlistment is complex and multifaceted. While it offers the potential for a more diverse and resilient military, it also risks lowering the overall educational and intellectual standards. Ultimately, the decision must be made with careful consideration of the long-term implications for military readiness, individual growth, and the nation's security.