Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh: Law Professor Opinions on His Fitness for the Bench

Recent discussions have centered on the opinions of law professors concerning Brett Kavanaugh's fitness to be elevated to the Supreme Court. While the percentage of law professors who signed a letter deeming Kavanaugh unsuitable might not be the primary focus, it is interesting to note that 83 ethics complaints were filed against him before his appointment. These complaints, while legally irrelevant, should certainly be concerning to those seeking integrity and justice on the highest court in the nation.

The Real Question: Why Ask?

The real query is why Michael Bruce posed this question in the first place. My hypothesis is that Bruce already knows the answer and was simply wanting to highlight that such a survey has taken place. However, I will indulge in speculation further anyway.

According to the New York Times, 2400 out of 27,000 law professors in the United States have signed this letter expressing their concern about Kavanaugh's fitness. While the correct figure might be in question, what truly matters is whether the Senate deems him qualified for the position. The Constitution does not mandate that one must be a lawyer to sit on the Supreme Court, a point often overlooked.

Reasons Behind the Signatures

It is worth considering why these professors signed the letter. Some may have done so on the basis of his temperament, while others might have signed due to their political beliefs. If Kavanaugh had managed to remain composed and restrained during the accusations, they might have interpreted that as evidence of guilt. As the saying goes, 'damned if you do, damned if you don’t.'

The Role of Academic Integrity

Especially concerning are the opinions of Communist law professors who do not adhere to the principle of unalienable rights to private property. The academic environment should nurture not just knowledge but also integrity. Instead of focusing on providing employment opportunities for their students, some professors seem to prioritize political agendas over student well-being.

The Accusations and Kavanaugh’s Response

Kavanaugh, despite the accusations and harsh media scrutiny, demonstrated tremendous restraint. The accusations lacked substantial evidence, and he was subjected to baseless attacks from those who should have never had a case against him in the first place. Had he exhibited any signs of anger or distress under such scrutiny, he would have been further vilified. Indeed, his ability to remain cool under pressure speaks not to his guilt but to his professional integrity.

Conclusion

While the voices of law professors may carry weight, the Senate ultimately holds the final say on Kavanaugh's fitness for the Supreme Court. The Constitution does not impose the requirement of legal expertise, which is often a heated topic of debate.