The Argument for Free Public University Education in the U.S.: A Debate
The topic of free public university education in the United States has been a contentious issue, often met with storms of criticism and defense. Personal anecdotes and emotional expressions abound, yet the core of the debate revolves around the practical benefits and limitations of such a system.
My Experience and Perspectives
Growing up in a household where educational costs were a constant struggle, the strain it placed on my family was palpable. My mother and her family had to pay for their college education for two years before her father's tragic death due to quack doctors. Similarly, my grandfather paid for my four years of college, and my husband and I prepaid my children's two years of community college. This historical perspective makes it even more baffling to hear the criticism from those who seem to have forgotten the sacrifices made to enable education for others.
The idea that 'crybabies' should pay for their own education is a viewpoint that is deeply rooted in a misunderstanding of the societal responsibility that comes with education. It's not just an individual's choice but a collective responsibility to invest in the future of our society. The criticism of individuals who spend exorbitant amounts on luxury items during their education period is misplaced. In a capitalist society, personal choices and financial priorities vary widely, and expecting everyone to prioritize education over material possessions is unrealistic and unfair.
The harsh judgment on those with degree programs deemed 'worthless' and the suggestion of labeling them as cries for pity or lazy is both harmful and misguided. The value of a degree lies in the skills it imparts and the pathways it opens. Art history, sociology, and other humanities may not lead to the same financial gain as STEM fields, but they contribute immensely to society in different ways. Moreover, the criticism that a degree in these fields does not prepare one for employment overlooks the fact that many students eventually pursue practical roles within these fields. For instance, an art history degree can lead to careers in museums, galleries, or digital archives, while a sociology degree can lead to roles in social work or public policy.
The Case for Free Public University
It is argued that countries with free university education, such as Finland and Sweden, see fewer graduates but higher standards for entry. These systems often focus on practicality and fewer 'soft' programs, directing resources towards courses that are in high demand and that can provide a solid foundation for future employment. One of the key benefits of these systems is that they prioritize quality education and practicality over the sheer volume of graduates.
For public education in the U.S. to be truly free, it would need to have higher standards for entry and fewer 'soft' programs, similar to systems in countries with free university education. The focus should shift towards STEM graduates who are essential for the technological and economic advancement of the nation. There should be a clear mission for the free education, making it accessible only to those who are truly capable of benefiting from it, with a strong emphasis on academic performance.
Furthermore, the free education should not be a lifetime commitment but should be conditional on academic performance, much like the loss of tax breaks for those who do not fulfill their financial obligations. Garnishing wages for those who default on student loans is a reasonable step, but the free education system should be designed to invest in high-performing students who are likely to contribute positively to society.
Lastly, the debate on free public education in the U.S. should not be about penalizing those who have different financial priorities but about supporting a system that benefits the majority. Free public education is not just a social justice issue but an economic and societal one, with the potential to create a more informed, skilled, and economically vibrant population.