The Benefits and Controversies of Allowing a Break During a 1.5-Hour Class
The age-old question of whether professors should provide a break during extended classes has sparked numerous discussions among educators, students, and academics. While some argue that taking a pause can enhance learning and well-being, others maintain that such breaks are unnecessary and can disrupt the structured flow of the class. In this article, we explore the benefits and controversies surrounding this topic, supported by insights from the educational community.
Arguments Against Offering a Break
The primary argument against a break is efficiency. Many educators, like the professor mentioned, believe that a 1.5-hour class, or 90 minutes, is long enough to cover the necessary material without interruption. They argue that too many breaks would hinder the learning process and impact the overall structure and pacing of the class. According to this viewpoint, taking a break might come across as unprofessional and disrespectful to the instructor's time and effort.
Furthermore, some educators believe that certain students lack the discipline to sit for long periods. They might suggest that these students improve their time management skills by taking on less demanding courses or working minimum wage jobs to gain a better understanding of academic constraints. This perspective underscores the idea that breaks are, in essence, a privilege for mature and responsible students.
Example Argument: No, the class is only 75 minutes long. That is hardly long enough for the professor to discuss the material needed to be covered in the class. To take a break would disrupt the teaching schedule. A student who does not have the maturity to sit for that length of time and take notes should drop out of school and work at a minimum wage job for a while. Then perhaps they will understand the privilege of being in school.
Arguments For Providing a Break
Supporters of offering a break often cite the positive impact it can have on student well-being and concentration. In today's hustle bustle, it is nice for students to know that they can take a bathroom break or even a quick snack if needed.
Mental and physical breaks can increase engagement and improve the quality of learning. A short break can help students clear their minds, relieve stress, and refresh their energy levels. This, in turn, contributes to a more effective learning experience. Moreover, allowing breaks can make the classroom environment more inclusive for students with special needs or those who may require additional support.
Example Argument: I think this is a very intelligent thing to give an optional break. Sometimes students want to take a bathroom break to clean their stuffy noses, cry, eat, or whatnot... it is a stress reliever knowing that a class has a break to be honest. It is an energy booster too.
Synthesizing the Debate
The decision to allow breaks during extended classes ultimately depends on a variety of factors, including the class content, the instructor's approach, and the institution's policies. A balanced strategy may involve collaborative discussions between educators and students to find a solution that works for everyone.
While some students argue for breaks to accommodate personal needs, others feel that the long class duration is essential for thorough material coverage. It is crucial for educators to consider the well-being and inclusivity of their students while maintaining the integrity of the academic curriculum.
Summary: The debate over offering breaks during a 1.5-hour class is complex and multifaceted, with both valid arguments for and against. Ultimately, the key lies in finding a balance that promotes both efficient learning and the well-being of students.