The Case Against Conservatism: Why Tradition Isn't Necessarily Progress

Conservatism is often presented as a beacon of stability, advocating for solutions that have been proven effective in the past. However, the very same principles that underpin conservatism can sometimes lead to detrimental outcomes when society is in a state of flux. This article delves into the critical arguments against conservatism, highlighting instances where the preservation of traditional values and practices has hindered progress and justice.

Introduction

Conservatism assumes that solutions which have worked in the past will continue to be effective in the future. This premise is valid if the context and circumstances have not changed. For example, if farmers in a region have traditionally sown their crops in the spring and harvested them in autumn, it would be illogical to suggest that the spring planting strategy is no longer suitable. However, as the world evolves, circumstances change, and outdated ideas often no longer serve the public interest. Just as driving a horse and buggy is no longer a reasonable form of transport, some traditional values and practices may be similarly outdated and even harmful.

The Critique of Conservatism: An Overview

One of the primary criticisms of conservatism is the perception that it often prioritizes maintaining status quo over addressing contemporary issues. Elections are not just about popularity; they have significant implications for the future of a nation. Therefore, it is crucial to choose leaders who prioritize the well-being of the country over their personal or party interests.

Furthermore, political parties often fail to serve as conduits for meaningful change, instead focusing on maintaining power through various means, including spreading hate and division. The need for new ideas and approaches is more pressing than ever, as the status quo is no longer sufficient.

The Dominance of Leftist Corporations

A significant portion of global media and entertainment is controlled by a handful of left-leaning corporations. This includes Google, Amazon, and Apple, each exerting substantial influence over the narrative and direction of public discourse. On the other hand, six leftist corporations control 90% of mainstream media, and left-leaning media voices dominate platforms such as Hollywood and Disney. The impact of these conglomerates on societal norms and public opinion cannot be understated.

Historical Examples of Conservative Missteps

Conservatism has often been at odds with progressive values throughout history. Conservative attitudes and policies have sometimes contributed to significant injustices and hindered societal progress. For instance, the belief that certain groups, such as women and non-white individuals, did not deserve certain rights and protections has long been a hallmark of conservative ideology.

Below are several historical instances where conservatism has failed to align with progressive values:

1. Opposition to Medical Advancements

Conservatives have historically opposed many medical advancements that have since become essential to public health. For example, the use of ether as a painkiller for women was opposed by some conservatives because they believed women did not deserve such medical treatments. Similarly, the theory of evolution was initially met with significant resistance from conservative quarters, and this opposition continues to this day. Child labor laws have also faced similar resistance, with conservatives arguing that children should contribute economically rather than be protected from harsh working conditions.

2. Opposition to Social Advancements

Conservatism has been at odds with social advancements aimed at empowering marginalized groups. For instance, the invention of menstrual pads faced resistance from conservative groups, who believed women could manage without such technological aids. The conservative push for the Comstock Laws, which restricted access to contraception, sex education, and information on menstruation, further illustrate this point. Additionally, conservatives have opposed anti-trust laws, resisted unionization, and have shown a strong aversion to civil rights movements, especially those concerning the integration of different racial and ethnic groups.

Conservatism also played a role in opposing pro-choice policies and supporting oppressive measures such as child marriage and eugenics. During the 20th century, conservative factions supported eugenics programs, and many conservatives were sympathetic to Hitler and his regime, viewing the Nazi movement as a means to preserve and protect white, Aryan racial purity. This historical context reveals a pattern of conservatism distancing itself from progressive social changes, particularly those aimed at improving the lives of marginalized groups.

3. Environmental Scares and Backlash

Conservatism has not always aligned with environmental protection efforts. For example, conservative groups have historically opposed measures aimed at protecting the environment, such as warning labels on cigarette packs or restrictions on smoking in public places. This lack of environmental consciousness has had serious and far-reaching consequences, contributing to the current global climate crisis.

4. Expansion of Rights

The conservative stance has often been in opposition to the expansion of civil liberties and social rights, including equal pay for women, the right to vote, and the progression of LGBTQ rights. Conservatives have long favored wars, including the Iraq War, and have shown a propensity to justify or even support practices like torture, regardless of their legality or ethical implications.

Conclusion

While conservatism can offer a valuable sense of historical continuity and stability, it is essential to scrutinize its adherence to outdated and morally impractical values. The pursuit of progress and justice requires a critical reevaluation of traditional values and a willingness to adapt and evolve. As society continues to undergo rapid changes, it is crucial for all of us to question and challenge the ideologies that no longer serve the best interests of our collective future.

Ultimately, the case against conservatism lies in its historical record of opposing progressive values, medical advancements, and social changes that could have benefited the underprivileged and marginalized. By recognizing and learning from these past missteps, we can work towards a more inclusive and equitable future.