The Dark Side of Academic Pursuits: Unveiling Scams and Exploitations in Graduate Programs

As a seasoned participant in the academic world, I must share my unfortunate journey through two seemingly reputable institutions: Fordham University and Wright State University. This experience has not only left me with a profound sense of regret but also fueled my determination to expose the darker undercurrents in the supposedly pristine world of academia.

Why I Chose to Share My Story: My primary motivation in recounting this experience is to warn current and potential students about the pitfalls and scams that lurk within certain graduate programs. These institutions, masquerading as prestigious leveraging names, often perpetuate fraudulent practices that lead to financial and emotional ruin for unsuspecting students.

Understanding the Scam: Fordham University and Wright State University

Both Fordham and Wright State universities fell short of their claims, primarily due to managerial incompetence, unethical practices, and a fraudulent curriculum design. My experience, though not isolated, serves as a stark illustration of the systemic problems that can plague graduate programs.

Why It's a Scam

Incompetent Leadership: The administrators and faculty at both institutions lacked the necessary qualifications to effectively manage and evaluate students. This incompetence led to a series of arbitrary decisions and an ineffective course of action. Arbitrary Requirements: The programs were structured with constantly changing prerequisites and requirements, causing confusion and frustration among students. Useless Coursework: Faculty members failed to adequately explain course material, leading to poorly graded assignments that students had to pay for regardless of quality.

Personal Tragedy: Wright State University

Attending Wright State University was a turning point for me. My experience was marred by discrimination, misuse of administrative procedures, and outright harassment. I was ensnared in a web of academic extortion, where every action was carefully designed to extort time, money, and emotional energy.

The Advisor, Kevin Bennett: My advisor, Kevin Bennett, was a toxic figure who actively and maliciously hindered my progress. His response to my departure summed up his attitude: 'Like swirling around in a toilet bowl trying to avoid the splashback.' This regrettable behavior is reflective of broader issues within the institution.

Academic Fraud and Corruption: Public Cases

The issue of fraud and corruption in academia is not isolated to my case. Prominent cases like 'Subnormal: A British Scandal' highlight the existence of systematic discrimination against specific students. In my experience, I, too, was a victim of discrimination, particularly sexism, which permeated through to the faculty and administration.

Low-Rating Institutions and Bad Experiences

While my experience at Wright State was particularly harrowing, it is important to note that bad experiences can occur at even highly-rated institutions. Factors contributing to poor academic experiences include low-quality faculty, unsecure locations, outdated facilities, and a lack of relevant job opportunities. Such factors can significantly impact the overall quality of education and student satisfaction.

Exposure of Abuses

The only way to combat such abuses is through exposure and awareness. It is crucial to report instances of discrimination, harassment, and academic fraud to ensure that perpetrators are held accountable. This transparency can help create a safer and more equitable academic environment for future students.

Examples of Scam Programs

Wright State University: A charter public university that had not achieved accrediting status but did not disclose this information to prospective or current students. The program had manipulative administration, deliberate budget mismanagement, and toxic cohort stalkers. Fordham University: An overpriced private school that used the MS platform to funnel funding to their other departments. Here, programs lacked transparency, had manipulative admin, deliberate budget mismanagement, and toxic cohort stalkers.

My Personal Experience with Wright State University

My involvement with Wright State University began with one specific incident when Dr. Valerie Shalin, a psychology professor, attempted to sabotage my progress. Dr. Shalin, in collaboration with her supervisor, Scott Wantamniuk, created arbitrary and manipulated grading criteria. My final project was marked negatively, and despite asking higher authorities for intervention, the decision was upheld. The program was a fraud, with fake work assigned, outdated software, and manipulative grading practices.

Conclusion

It is imperative that prospective and current students exercise caution when selecting graduate programs. Transparency, accountability, and the well-being of students should be the top priorities for any reputable institution. By sharing my experiences, I hope to shed light on the hardships faced by many and provide guidance for those seeking a fulfilling academic journey.

Do Not Support These Programs: These institutions should be exposed and held accountable for their fraudulent practices. Supporting them only perpetuates the cycle of misinformation and exploitation.