The Impact of Caste Discrimination on Brahmins in India: A Sadistic Measure or a Merit-Based System?
Recent discussions on social media and platforms like Quora have magnified concerns about the impact of caste discrimination on India's Brahmins. Questions have arisen regarding whether efforts to punish the present generation of Brahmins for past ancestors' crimes are merely sadistic or intended to serve other political or social motives. This article explores these issues and offers insights into the current state of Brahmin society in India.
Understanding the Contemporary Context
According to some critics, efforts to shun or discriminate against Brahmins are deliberate attempts by politicians to manipulate the emotions of the less educated populace. Religious leaders also contribute to this by spreading venom against Brahmins, a strategy that has failed to convert a single true Brahmin. Furthermore, the divisive 'rule by divide' strategy is heavily employed by politicians to maintain their control.
It is crucial to emphasize that Brahmin hood is not determined by birth but by one's deeds and character. Encouraging intelligent individuals helps ensure that politicians and evangelists cannot continue to profit from the status quo. However, despite such policies and resultant hatred, Brahmins continue to chart their own paths and secure their prosperity.
Brahmin Hatred and Its Consequences
The cruel treatment faced by Brahmins has had significant and detrimental effects on society. Many Brahmins have been driven away from knowledge functions, leaving a vast knowledge gap in Indian society. Consequently, the knowledge capital has diminished, leading to mediocrity. This situation is further worsened by the lack of individuals willing to fill these gaps, which were vacated due to ill-will.
Historical Context and Colonial Influence
Let's delve into the historical context. The word 'Brahmin' simply means "wisdom." As mentioned in the Rig Veda (10.90), Brahmins derive their higher human capabilities from a cosmic intelligence called 'purusha.' This intelligence is further divided into four aspects: wisdom, nobility, industry, and talent. Each of these traits is essential for upholding and sustaining humanity.
The British, upon their arrival in India, sought to divide and rule through various means. They introduced the Hindu-Muslim divide, which was easy to implement due to the shared Abrahamic roots. The North-South Aryan-Dravidian divide was based on a fanciful notion. More significantly, they exploited India's caste system, introducing concepts from India's own philosophy to create divisions among Hindus.
Over the years, the traditional Sanskrit education was replaced with English education. This shift began in 1835 and by 1855, the 'brown elite' had emerged. The rebellion of 1857 saw the direct rule of the British over Company territories, and India entered the colonial era. The introduction of the 'caste system' in 1871-72 through the first colonial census further entrenched these divisions, using various terms found in Indian philosophy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the oppression faced by Brahmins has significant implications for Indian society. While there are valid concerns about the effectiveness and morality of reservation policies and the spread of hatred, it is essential to recognize that Brahmins continue to thrive through their own efforts. It is time to reevaluate the social structures and policies that impact Brahmins and promote a more inclusive and merit-based society.