The Myth of Skin Color in Hindu Mythology: A Brahminical Bias

For centuries, scholars and researchers have delved into the rich tapestry of Hindu mythology, attempting to uncover the true meanings and intentions behind the rich narratives. However, one phenomenon that has often baffled and perplexed them is the depiction of Asuras or Rakshasas as having black skin, and that of Devas or deities as white. This article aims to dissect the roots of this portrayal, challenging the commonly held belief that this is evidence of a political move by the Aryan ancestors against native tribes.

Historical Context and Myths

In Hindu mythology, Asuras and Rakshasas are often portrayed as evil, representing chaos, deceit, and destruction. Conversely, Devas, or gods, are depicted as white-skinned, embodying virtue, wisdom, and purity. However, one theory suggests that this depiction might be more about the physical appearance of certain people from Africa who were used as a symbol of danger and were later considered Rakshasas. This notion might explain the portrayal of Asuras as having darker skin.

Nevertheless, such interpretations should be approached with caution. It is important to note that these descriptions do not necessarily reflect historical or genetic realities. While the skin color of humans may vary based on genetics, geography, and a myriad of other factors, attributing specific moral qualities or social status based on skin color is neither accurate nor fair. The portrayal of characters in mythology is often a reflection of cultural, social, and political values of the time.

Non-Brahminical Perspectives

One important perspective to consider is that of non-Brahminical perspectives. The mythological descriptions of deities and demons as being of specific skin tones might be more about the values and social structures of the time in which they were written. For instance, Shiva is described as having skin as white as camphor, while goddesses like Gauri and Lakshmi are described as fair and glowing.

These descriptions do not necessarily indicate any intrinsic qualities of the characters but rather reflect the values and aesthetics of the society that created the narratives. This perspective challenges the assumption that the skin color of characters has any inherent meaning beyond the narrative itself.

Social and Cultural Context

The portrayal of Asuras and Devas through the lens of skin color is deeply intertwined with cultural and social dynamics. The skin color of deities is often used to convey ideals of purity and righteousness, while the darkness of Asuras is associated with chaos and destruction. This can be seen as an attempt to impose a hierarchy and create a moral framework for society.

It is also important to note that this portrayal has been used to perpetuate a form of social stratification. For instance, the color white often symbolizes high caste and satvic (pure) qualities, while black symbolizes low caste and tamasic (polluted) qualities. This cultural bias has been institutionalized and perpetuated through generations, leading to a systematic violation of human rights and perpetuation of racism, colorism, and misogyny.

Conclusion

The portrayal of skin color in Hindu mythology is far more complex and culturally nuanced than is commonly perceived. It is a reflection of the values, aesthetics, and social dynamics of the time in which these narratives were created. The belief that this portrayal was a political move by the Aryan ancestors is a simplification that overlooks the broader cultural and social context. It is crucial to approach these narratives with an open and critical mindset, recognizing the historical and cultural factors that shaped them.

The problem is not Aryan versus Dravidian, but Brahminism versus International Human Rights. It is time to recognize and address the institutionalized racism, colorism, and misogyny embedded in Brahminical ideology, and work towards a more inclusive and equitable society.