Understanding Formal Methods of Assessment: Beyond the Surface
By Sohail Nayaz Siddiqui
Word Count: 3000
Introduction to Formal Assessment
Formal assessments are a systematic and standardized method used to measure the extent to which students have learned the material covered in a course. This method goes beyond the ambiguous and often misleading general feedback often provided by less structured evaluations. Successful formal assessments provide clear, quantifiable evidence of a student's mastery of content, and can be compared to established standards.
Types of Formal Assessments
Formal assessments can be divided into several categories, each serving a specific purpose in the educational landscape:
Quizzes and Assignments
Quizzes and assignments are perhaps the most common types of formal assessments. These usually involve multiple-choice questions, short answer questions, and written or practical exercises. The flexibility of these assessments allows them to be adapted to a wide range of subjects and learning outcomes. They are particularly useful for gauging students' understanding of the material at various points throughout the course.
Live Projects
Live projects are another form of formal assessment, typically used in more applied fields such as engineering, business, and programming. These projects require students to apply the knowledge and skills they have acquired in real-world scenarios. Live projects not only test a student's technical skills but also their ability to work in teams, manage time, and solve complex problems.
Standardized Tests
Standardized tests are administered at a nationally or globally agreed-upon level, such as the SAT, ACT, or AP exams. These are often criterion-referenced, meaning they assess whether students meet a set of predetermined standards. Standardized tests can provide a standardized measure across different schools and educational systems, making it easier to compare a student's performance.
Criterion-Referenced Tests
Criterion-referenced tests are designed to assess whether students have met specific learning objectives. Unlike norm-referenced tests, which rank students against their peers, criterion-referenced tests offer a clear indication of whether a student has achieved the learning goals of the course. These tests are particularly useful for determining if a student is ready to move on to more advanced topics or if additional support is needed.
Implications of Informal vs. Formal Assessment
While informal assessments, such as class discussions and quick question-and-answer sessions, can provide valuable insights into students' understanding, they are often less structured and less definitive. They can be subjective and may not provide a comprehensive picture of a student's abilities. In contrast, formal assessments offer a more structured and objective measure of performance, and can be used to make more informed decisions about student placement, certification, or advancement in academic or professional careers.
The Fallibility of Technology-Based Evaluations
The case of the evaluation by Washington State Technology highlights the potential pitfalls of relying solely on technology-based assessments. The evaluation provided an estimated success rate and potential interest from companies, but without actual hands-on experience or in-depth knowledge of the subject matter, the results may be misleading or incomplete. Experienced evaluators, like those in the assay laboratory, provide finite and accurate information based on concrete measurements and evidence. This reflects the importance of having qualified peers involved in the assessment process, who can provide reliable and context-specific feedback.
The Role of Legitimacy in Digital Assessments
The case also underscores the difference between compelling arguments in legal terms and their effectiveness in digital contexts. Legal standards require a high degree of specificity and evidence, which is often lacking in general advice or vague assessments. In the digital realm, assessments need to be clear, quantifiable, and based on concrete data to be truly effective.
Peer Evaluation as a Valuable Tool
An evaluation by qualified peers can enhance the credibility and reliability of the assessment process. Peer evaluations involve having experts in the field provide a structured and detailed assessment of a student's work. This not only provides more accurate and specific feedback but also creates a sense of community and accountability. However, when new discoveries or non-traditional knowledge is involved, it becomes challenging to find suitable comparisons or "comparables," as the finding and experience guides may be limited or non-existent.
Conclusion
Formal assessments are a critical component of the educational process, providing a structured and standardized way to measure student learning. While technology and digital tools have greatly expanded the possibilities for formal assessments, it is essential to ensure that these assessments are based on sound methodology and conducted by qualified individuals. Peer evaluations, in particular, can offer valuable insights and reliability. As educators and assessors, we must be mindful of the limitations and ensure that our assessments are both valid and transparent.
Follow me at Quora for more updates and insights into educational technology and assessment methods.
Click @Sohail Nayaz Siddiqui for more updates and insights into educational technology and assessment methods.
If you like this answer, don't forget to UPVOTE!