Understanding the Critical Freethinking Sovereign American Citizen

When discussing the role of an individual in a democratic society, one term that often surfaces is the 'critical freethinking sovereign American citizen.' This individual is a rarity in the landscape of contemporary thinking, particularly in countries like Canada, the United States, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Brazil. A critical freethinking sovereign American citizen does not simply accept the information presented to them nor uncritically adopt any ideology. Instead, they engage in their own research and base their conclusions on empirical evidence and logical analysis.

Finding the Real Truth

A key characteristic of a critical freethinking sovereign American citizen is their approach to information. They do not accept narratives at face value. Instead, they critically evaluate the evidence presented and form their own conclusions based on facts and logical reasoning. This mindset is often seen in a broader, more impartial perspective, akin to a teacher mediating between two children in a dispute. The aim is to move beyond the binary of political leanings—liberal, conservative, or socialist—and instead focus on overall outcomes and the common good.

The Evolution of Liberalism

The author's transition from an old-school liberal to a more critical freethinking mindset is a reflection of evolving political landscapes and ideologies. Contemporary liberalism has increasingly blended elements of democratic and socialist thinking, influenced by activist movements and thinkers like Saul Alinsky. However, the author observes that this hybrid form of liberalism is no longer about solidarity and progress but about a kind of activist balderdash. The author cautions that these contemporary liberals, while well-intentioned, might be contributing to their own downfall through missteps and lack of strategic coherence.

The Dark Side of Sovereignty

While the concept of a freethinking and sovereign individual may seem appealing, some voices argue that it leads to an unhealthy delusion. Some suggest that there is a pervasive belief that individuals are not subject to the authority of the United States government. This delusion is often coupled with efforts to bypass legal obligations, such as tax evasion, through deliberate actions like filing papers to 'declare' sovereignty. While libertarians embrace this thinking, the author warns that such behavior can be dangerous and potentially illegal.

Conclusion

Being a critical freethinking sovereign American citizen is a complex but essential role for individuals in today's world. It requires a balanced approach that values research, logical thinking, and empirical evidence. While there might be some pitfalls and warnings, this mindset is vital for navigating the sometimes murky waters of modern politics and society. By fostering independent thought and critical analysis, individuals can contribute positively to their communities and their nation.

Key Takeaways

A critical freethinking sovereign American citizen bases their beliefs on empirical evidence and logical reasoning. Empathy and impartiality, like a teacher mediating a dispute, are key to this mindset. Contemporary liberalism has evolved and may now be less coherent and strategic. The concept of sovereignty can lead to delusion and potential legal issues.

By understanding and practicing these principles, individuals can become more effective and responsible members of society.