Why Bihar Needs a New Era of Governance, Not Another Failed Deputy CM
The issue of governance in Bihar has been a topic of much debate for years. The argument that Bihar does not need yet another failed deputy chief minister is a compelling one, particularly when one considers the historical performance of the state and the prioritization of caste politics over developmental issues.
Historical Performance and Caste Politics
Bihar has largely remained stagnant, especially when it comes to economic and social development, regardless of whether it has educated chief ministers or not. The state saw a brief period of positive growth in the late 2000s under the leadership of Nitish Kumar, but even that progress has since faded. Similarly, in Madhya Pradesh, a state that saw some initial improvements under Shivraj Singh Chouhan, the gains have now been lost.
The peculiar focus on caste census in Bihar is quite alarming. Prioritizing such trivial matters over developmental needs reveals a deeper problem in the political culture of the state. The real question is whether these politicians are genuinely committed to the welfare of their constituents or if they are more interested in perpetuating caste-based politics and maintaining a personal personality cult.
A Need for Real Development
One cannot ignore the stark realities of Bihar. With 52% multidimensional poverty, just 38 per thousand infant mortality rate, and only 54% female literacy, the state remains among the poorest in the country. These figures are a clear indication that the current leadership, no matter their political affiliation, needs a serious overhaul. Ministers and politicians from all sides—UPA (United Progressive Alliance), NDA (National Democratic Alliance), and third fronts—should refrain from claiming any achievements until they have lifted the state out of its quagmire.
It’s important to appreciate that this is a collective issue facing the state, and there is no denying the struggles faced by Biharis. However, the state needs to move beyond caste-based politics and personality cults. Leaders like Lalu Prasad and Tejashwi Yadav have done significant damage to the state’s reputation and socio-economic development, and the time has come for a new era of genuine governance.
Education vs. Empathy in Governance
The argument that education is necessary for good governance sometimes overshadows the need for genuine empathy and grassroots-level connection. While having an educated leader can be beneficial, it is not a strict requirement. Consider the example of Tamil Nadu, one of the most developed states in India. Not only is it economically strong, but it is also known for its high index of human development. The iconic chief ministers who have brought the state to prominence—K. Kamaraj, M. Karunanidhi, and M.G. Ramachandran—were not highly educated and were often school dropouts.
What they lacked in formal education, they made up for in their genuine connection with the people and their empathy for the common man. A true leader knows how to listen, understand, and represent the needs and aspirations of their constituents. This is the quality that should be prioritized over academic qualifications in the context of public service.
Conclusion
The continued reliance on failed deputy chief ministers and the ongoing caste politics in Bihar suggest that the state is still in need of genuine reform. The focus should be on developing a system of governance that is more responsive to the needs of the people, rather than one that is driven by personal and caste-based ambitions. It is time for Bihar to move beyond the cycles of failure and embrace a new era of genuine democratic governance.
By prioritizing real development, empathy, and grassroots-level engagement, Bihar can finally break free from its developmental stagnation. It is time for politicians to put aside their personal and ideological divides and work towards a brighter future for the state and its people.