Why Do Writers Leverage Poor and Incorrect Grammar in U.S. Television?

Television has a unique ability to captivate audiences, submerging them into worlds that reflect both reality and fiction. One of the most fascinating aspects of this medium is the use of poor and incorrect grammar by writers, a practice that seems to be on the rise. This article delves into the reasons behind this choice, examining character development, realism, humor, audience engagement, and creative license.

Character Development

The decision to use poor grammar underscores the complexity of characters in television. Writers often employ non-standard grammar to underscore a character's educational background, regional accent, or personality traits. This technique not only enhances the authenticity of dialogue but also provides valuable insight into a character's world. For instance, a character from a less privileged background might have a different approach to language, reflecting their life experiences and social positioning. This linguistic choice helps distinguish characters and makes them relatable to a wider audience.

Realism in Dialogue

Television often mirrors real life, and this includes the way people actually speak. Dialogue frequently contains grammatical errors, regional slang, and colloquialisms. The goal for writers is to create a natural flow that resonates with the viewer's experiences. Realism in dialogue enhances the believability of scenes, making the narrative more immersive. By capturing the nuances of everyday speech, writers can create a more authentic and engaging story.

Humor and Humour

Poor grammar can serve a humorous purpose in television. Mispronunciations, misuse of grammar rules, and awkward sentence structures can be used to create comedic moments. Characters who utilize incorrect grammar can be used as a source of laughter, highlighting their innocence or ignorance in a lighthearted manner. This approach adds an element of humor to the narrative, making the story more enjoyable for the audience. For example, in sitcoms like The Big Bang Theory, the misusage of grammar is used to comedic effect, adding to the show's charm and entertainment value.

Audience Engagement

Some television shows target younger audiences, who are often less strict about grammar rules. An informal tone can make content more relatable and engaging. This choice helps in building a connection between the audience and the characters, making the story more appealing. Shows that prioritize this approach often find a loyal fanbase that appreciates the authenticity and relatability of the content.

Creative License

Writers often prioritize creativity and storytelling over strict adherence to grammatical rules. This creative freedom allows them to make stylistic choices that may not conform to standard grammar. The use of poor grammar can be a deliberate stylistic choice that enhances the narrative. For instance, a writer might choose to use non-standard grammar to mirror a character's thought process or to create a specific mood or atmosphere in the story. This freedom in writing allows for a more diverse and dynamic storytelling approach.

Challenges and Controversies

The use of poor and incorrect grammar has also sparked controversy in some quarters. Critics argue that it can contribute to an overall lack of respect for language and learning, reinforcing bad habits among viewers. Some point out that substituting "me and" for "I and" can seem lazy and unprofessional, associated with a certain level of ignorance or non-academic background. However, it's important to note that not everyone in real life uses proper grammar all the time, and reflecting this in television can be seen as a form of realistic portrayal.

The Evolution of Language

Language itself is constantly evolving, and what was once considered incorrect grammar can become acceptable over time. The shift towards more relaxed standards in language use can be attributed to cultural and social changes. The internet and social media, in particular, have accelerated this evolution, seeing a proliferation of new terms, phrases, and spellings that are often grammatically incorrect. Writers who incorporate these newer forms of language may be responding to these changes, making their content more relevant and engaging with the audience.

In conclusion, the use of poor and incorrect grammar in television is a multifaceted choice that serves various narrative and character-driven purposes. It enhances realism, adds humor, engages audiences, and reflects the evolution of language. While it may prompt debates and critiques, its role in television cannot be ignored, as it continues to shape and influence the medium.