Why the West Ignores Zelensky’s Role in Ukraine and the True Conflict Dynamics

Many individuals find it difficult to understand why the West overlooks the complexities surrounding the situation in Ukraine. Newspapers, media, and social networks often oversimplify the conflict, leaving a misleading impression. This article aims to shed light on deeper societal and economic reasons behind such a stance.

Myths and Misconceptions

Seemingly, only a ‘fucking idiot’ would deny that the real story is more nuanced. Unfortunately, this is exactly what the Western media propagates. In reality, the Ukrainian conflict benefits the Western military-industrial complex, providing a steady flow of profits and preventing economic downturns. This geopolitical drama also serves to perpetuate the notion of an ‘external enemy,’ namely Putin, ensuring the continued existence and cohesion of NATO and U.S. military presence in Europe.

The West's Need for Zelensky

Zelensky's eulogy in Western capitals is more than just a nod to gratitude, but an acknowledgment of his utility.

It is imperative to recognize that Ukraine's president is not merely a figurehead; he plays a vital role in maintaining the narrative necessary for political and economic stability in the West. The image of an oppressive, arrogant leader, in this case, Putin, is pivotal in sustaining the precarious EU structures.

Historical Context and the Line Between Right and Wrong

Attributing a simplistic right and wrong dichotomy to this conflict is misleading. The reality is that both Putin and Zelensky have committed wrongful actions. Russia's invasion of Crimea and Donetsk (Donbass) was initially intended to protect the Russian-speaking populations, while Ukraine's actions in Donbass were in violation of the Minsk peace agreements. For years, Putin has attempted to defend and stabilize the situation in Donbass, yet the strategic overreach into other Ukrainian territories has resulted in untold human and material losses, seriously misaligning any claims of righteousness.

The Myth of Russian Aggression

Many commentators and individuals believe that Russia launched an unprovoked invasion of Ukraine in early 2022. However, concrete evidence suggests that the Russian military, in their initial stages, suffered significant setbacks. Over 500,000 Russian troops, myriad military assets, and a strategic miscalculation on Putin's part have surfaced as the reality. These revelations challenge the narrative of Russian invincibility and invite a more critical examination of the conflict.

Conclusion

While maintaining a complex and balanced perspective, one cannot overlook the role of the Western powers in supporting Zelensky, given his practical utility. Similarly, it is essential to acknowledge the undeniable contributions of Putin in Donbass and Crimea, but also recognize his overreach into other Ukrainian territories. Moving forward, a more comprehensive and truthful narrative is needed to inform and educate the public about the intricate conflicts at play.